The term “hair restoration” can be used to refer to many different procedures that include both surgical and non-surgical options. The all-encompassing nature of the term could be somewhat confusing to those who are unaware of the wealth of procedures available to patients looking for the best method for addressing thinning hair or hair loss. The term is often used to describe any procedure in which a patient is able to improve their overall appearance through the restoration of a natural-looking hairline and thicker head of hair, including each of the following procedures:
Of course, there are quite a number of other procedures available to patients in New York, Greenwich, Connecticut: Chicago, Illinois; Washington D.C. and Norther Virginia; Houston, Dallas, Texas; Manila, Philippines; Dubai, Abu Dhabi,U.A.E.; andKarachi, Pakistan, including topical or oral solutions such as Rogaine and Propecia. It should also be noted that hair restoration is not limited to addressing hair loss or thinning hair occurring on the scalp, as facial and body hair transplants are also commonplace and fall under the definition of hair restoration.
What is surgical hair restoration?
Surgical hair restoration procedures include some of the most popular and effective procedures available in New York, Greenwich, Connecticut: Chicago, Illinois; Washington D.C. and Northern Virginia; Houston, Dallas, Texas; Manila, Philippines;Dubai, Abu Dhabi,U.A.E.; and Karachi, Pakistan, with FUE and FUT representing the preferred options of many doctors and patients. As surgical procedures, these hair restoration options involve the use of a local anesthetic and, depending on the specific procedure selected, might require some downtime following the completion of the hair transplant.
In both the FUE and FUT procedures, patients are placed under local anesthetic while the hair transplant surgeon excises hair follicles from the donor site and prepares the recipient site for the follicular transplant. A surgical hair restoration procedure such as FUT enables the doctor to transplant a greater number of follicular units during a single session, but the time needed for recovery — although it is quite short — is slightly lengthier than the recovery needed following an FUE session.
As a surgical procedure, the FUT hair transplant procedure does leave a horizontal scar at the donor site. While a scar may remain on the scalp, hair transplant doctors are able to ensure that the scar is not visible and is covered by the patient’s own, naturally occurring hair. Not all surgical hair restoration procedures leave a scar behind, as FUE is a no linear scar technique that involves the extraction and transplantation of individual follicles. The procedure is more time-consuming for this reason, but the recovery is quick and sessions can be performed on consecutive days if need be.
What is non-surgical hair restoration?
Due to continued innovation within the field of hair restoration, the number viable of non-surgical hair restoration options continues to grow. Most patients are already well aware of the availability of topical or oral solutions like Propecia and Rogaine, both of which are suitable as a supplement to other hair restoration options or as a method for protecting against further hair loss. In addition to topical and oral solutions, patients can also opt for non-invasive and non-surgical methods that include scalp micropigmentation.
Scalp micropigmentation is a newly developed procedure that represents a cost-effective alternative to surgical hair restoration options, but it is also an effective choice for those looking to further supplement a hair transplant procedure like FUT or FUE. A patient undergoing scalp micropigmentation benefits from the non-invasive nature of the procedure as well as the fact that it delivers immediate results.
Through the utilization of highly sophisticated and digitally controlled needles, the technician will deliver a specialized pigment at a shallow depth that closely replicates the appearance of stubble or closely cropped hair. Since this procedure does not rely on the availability of sufficient donor hair, there is no limit in terms of the density or the hairline created through the use of scalp micropigmentation.
Like other non-surgical options, scalp micropigmentation does not require the use of any surgical incisions to secure follicular units from the donor site or to transplant follicular units into the recipient site. There is no scarring left behind by scalp micropigmentation and there is no maintenance required once the procedure has been completed.
Non-surgical options may be ideal for any number of patients, but it is always best for a prospective patient to discuss all of the available hair restoration options with a highly skilled and experienced hair transplant surgeon. The consultation process at a hair transplant clinic in New York; Greenwich, Connecticut; Chicago, Illinois; Washington D.C. and Northern Virginia; Houston, Dallas, Texas;Manila, Philippines; Dubai, Abu Dhabi,U.A.E.; and Karachi, Pakistan, the ideal time for a discussion of the various methodologies available and how each hair restoration procedure might benefit the patient according to his or her own individual hair restoration needs. The doctor can evaluate the nature of the patient’s hair loss and determine which surgical or non-surgical procedure — or some combination of surgical and non-surgical procedures — is most ideal for achieving the patient’s hair restoration goals.
What is strip hair restoration?
A strip hair restoration, also referred to as a Follicular Unit Transplant (FUT), is one of the most effective surgical options for patients looking to create a natural-looking hairline while restoring volume to the areas of the scalp affected by thinning hair or hair loss. As a surgical procedure, a strip hair transplant involves surgical incisions to harvest and transplant the follicular units, thus requiring the use of a local anesthetic.
To secure the follicular units from the donor site, the doctor will surgically remove a horizontal strip from the scalp, most often the lower portion of the back of the head. This is why the FUT hair transplant procedure is commonly known as a strip hair transplant. The hair transplant doctors in New York City; Greenwich, Connecticut; Chicago, Illinois; Washington D.C. and Northern Virginia; Houston, Dallas, Texas; Manila, Philippines; Dubai, Abu Dhabi,U.A.E.; and Karachi, Pakistan, will choose the donor site based on the likelihood of yielding the greatest number of grafts, but will also make a selection that ensures the horizontal scar created by this process can be easily obscured by the patient’s remaining hair. Once removed, the strip can be dissected into the follicular units that will ultimately be transplanted into the recipient site.
An FUT hair transplant is considered one of the most ideal options due to the fact that this technique allows the doctor to transplant a significant number of grafts in a single session. Each session lasts about four hours in total and can involve the transplantation of up to 3,000 grafts (up to 9,000 total follicles). Patients undergoing the strip hair transplant procedure may need to take it easy for a few days following the completion of the hair transplant, and it takes about six months before the results of the procedure are realized by the patient, and up to a year before you see density.
What is FUE hair restoration?
FUE, or Follicular Unit Extraction, is similar to the FUT procedure in that it is a highly effective surgical hair restoration option. When undergoing the FUE procedure, patients will receive a local anesthetic so that the doctor is able to surgically remove individual follicular units for transplantation into the recipient site. Since the follicular units are removed from the donor site on an individual basis, there is no linear scar like the one left behind by the FUT methodology.
The individual removal of follicular units also means that FUE is more time-consuming than FUT and limits the number of grafts that can be transplanted during a single session. Even though FUE is a surgical procedure, it is possible to undergo transplant sessions on consecutive days in order to generate the result being sought by the patient through the use of an FUEhair transplant procedure. FUE also allows the patient to return to normal activities in a shorter timeframe when compared to FUT, and many resume their normal schedule on the day following the completion of their procedure.
The no linear scar, no-suture nature of the FUE procedure is part of the reason Follicular Unit Extraction is so popular among patients, but it is also highly effective and yields an exceptional result for the hair transplant patient. Since FUE and FUT are essentially equally effective in terms of the final result the procedure is able to deliver, it is up to the doctors in New York;Greenwich, Connecticut; Chicago, Illinois; Washington D.C. and Northern Virginia; Houston, Dallas, Texas; Manila, Philippines;Dubai, Abu Dhabi,U.A.E.; and Karachi, Pakistan, and the patient to work together to determine whether FUE or FUT is most ideal when it comes to the individual patient’s wants and needs with regard to the process, including everything from the pre- to post-operative stage.
What is robotic hair restoration?
Robotic hair restoration may refer to any number of procedures in which some sort of automated system is utilized. Although the breadth of the definition certainly means that the term can be applied to a wide range of hair restoration procedures, it is most often the case that the robotic or automated systems are utilized in conjunction with surgical transplant options like FUE or FUT.
Doctors often utilize these automated systems in a complementary way, and it is possible that these systems can be applied to the different processes used during the extraction, dissection, storage, and transplantation of follicular units into the recipient site. Technologies that may be featured in a robotic hair restoration include pneumatic tools and refrigerated storage systems, often with the goal of securing and preserving the greatest possible volume of viable donor tissue for transplantation into the patient’s recipient site.
Although the rapid advance of technology has certainly been beneficial for hair transplant doctorsand patients, it is critical to understand that these automated systems still require the presence of a skilled and experienced hair transplant surgeon to oversee and operate the automated aspects of the procedure. Whereas many doctors firmly believe in the benefits associated with automation, but there are still many other surgeons in New York; Greenwich, Connecticut; Chicago, Illinois; Washington D.C. and Northern Virginia; Houston, Dallas, Texas; Manila, Philippines; Dubai, Abu Dhabi,U.A.E.; and Karachi, Pakistan, who prefer to perform a manual hair transplant. At this point, electing to use robotic or automated systems is a matter of preference between doctors and does not yield any advantage or disadvantage one way or the other.